<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Issue38 - I´m back doing business online</title>
	<link>http://www.thejunglemarketer.com/blog/newsletter-archive/58</link>
	<description>affiliate &#038; internet marketing, website promotion &#038; design, search engine optimization</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 23:13:15 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Troy</title>
		<link>http://www.thejunglemarketer.com/blog/newsletter-archive/58#comment-6339</link>
		<author>Troy</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2007 15:28:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.thejunglemarketer.com/blog/newsletter-archive/58#comment-6339</guid>
		<description>Hi Guido,

Glad to see you are back. I was just checking feed reader and noticed new posts. Always enjoy your insights and good information without the hype of many marketers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Guido,</p>
<p>Glad to see you are back. I was just checking feed reader and noticed new posts. Always enjoy your insights and good information without the hype of many marketers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: greg</title>
		<link>http://www.thejunglemarketer.com/blog/newsletter-archive/58#comment-6311</link>
		<author>greg</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2007 14:06:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.thejunglemarketer.com/blog/newsletter-archive/58#comment-6311</guid>
		<description>I am confused. So, what else is new? ;P

You say that unique content is king, yet then you say to use PLR content instead of unique content?

&lt;blockquote&gt;Greg: in the newsletter, I said that "I´ve built sites using unique articles and others using PLR articles, but only those sites with unique content are doing well. ..."
In other words: I still do have some minisites that are built purely with PLR content, but as said: in my experience, &lt;strong&gt;unique&lt;/strong&gt; articles are doing &lt;strong&gt;much better&lt;/strong&gt; than PLR articles. There are, however, good ways to use PLR content: 

1. for e-courses sent by Autoresponder
2. for downloadable reports (free or paid)
3. for bonuses to your existing products

You could even add a few PLR articles to your site, but nowadays I would rather build my sites with unique content only.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am confused. So, what else is new? ;P</p>
<p>You say that unique content is king, yet then you say to use PLR content instead of unique content?</p>
<blockquote><p>Greg: in the newsletter, I said that &#8220;I´ve built sites using unique articles and others using PLR articles, but only those sites with unique content are doing well. &#8230;&#8221;<br />
In other words: I still do have some minisites that are built purely with PLR content, but as said: in my experience, <strong>unique</strong> articles are doing <strong>much better</strong> than PLR articles. There are, however, good ways to use PLR content: </p>
<p>1. for e-courses sent by Autoresponder<br />
2. for downloadable reports (free or paid)<br />
3. for bonuses to your existing products</p>
<p>You could even add a few PLR articles to your site, but nowadays I would rather build my sites with unique content only.
</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
